|
|
Post by Horizonleaguer on Feb 5, 2005 15:50:36 GMT -6
Any questions who is better.....That was not even a contest today, Joah dominated in every facet of the game and made Armond look silly more than a few times...
|
|
|
|
Post by spike1057 on Feb 5, 2005 17:08:00 GMT -6
How about on the defensive end how many steals did armond have
|
|
|
|
Post by Big D on Feb 5, 2005 17:16:10 GMT -6
Any questions who is better.....That was not even a contest today, Joah dominated in every facet of the game and made Armond look silly more than a few times... Neither side can argue one way or the other after today's performances. Tucker had more points but Armond had more steals, less turnovers, more defensive rebounds, and more offensive rebounds alone than Tucker had total rebounds. I will say that Tucker showed some nice range, but still....Armond played pretty well minus the missed dunk...yikes, did that ever hurt. |
|
|
|
Post by Horizonleaguer on Feb 5, 2005 17:32:59 GMT -6
Way to convienently leave out that Joah had more blocks, played less minutes shot a better percentage and shot better from the line, which was another reason we beat you guys was...
Joah flat out is better as I have said over and over and over.....26/7 while shooting 9-16 and 8-10 from the line and getting a WIN speak for itself
|
|
|
|
Post by Big D on Feb 5, 2005 17:40:12 GMT -6
Way to convienently leave out that Joah had more blocks, played less minutes shot a better percentage and shot better from the line, which was another reason we beat you guys was... Joah flat out is better as I have said over and over and over.....26/7 while shooting 9-16 and 8-10 from the line and getting a WIN speak for itself OK, so what's your point....so they split the categories as far as who was better? The yahoo box score had both players with no blocks, by the way. And Tucker played less minutes....was he tired? Maybe his stamina is not as good as Armond's... this can be argued so many ways so let's put it to rest.... |
|
|
|
Post by Horizonleaguer on Feb 5, 2005 17:46:05 GMT -6
His stamina....Hahaha, actually we just have a better team who goes deeper into there bench and has players fresh...That is part of our rotation that we run EVERY game....You guys would not know about htat though since Jimmy has no consistent rotation and does not have the luxury of using a deep bench and has to play his guys 38+ minutes a game...That is the reason they cant get it done late in games is cause they are to damn tired...We owned you FIB losers
|
|
|
|
Post by Big D on Feb 5, 2005 17:59:32 GMT -6
His stamina....Hahaha, actually we just have a better team who goes deeper into there bench and has players fresh...That is part of our rotation that we run EVERY game....You guys would not know about htat though since Jimmy has no consistent rotation and does not have the luxury of using a deep bench and has to play his guys 38+ minutes a game...That is the reason they cant get it done late in games is cause they are to damn tired...We owned you FIB losers Wait, I thought we were talking about Armond vs Joah...not UIC rotation vs UWM rotation.... I don't know about you but if Michael Jordan could play all 48 minutes, I'd want him to play all 48 minutes....not take him out for the sake of rotating. If Tucker is such a great player and he had the stamina, he'd be in the game.....maybe next year when Armond is gone, he'll be the man... |
|
|
|
Post by Horizonleaguer on Feb 5, 2005 18:02:01 GMT -6
Pretty sure that Joah had more than his way with Armond and did anything he wanted to today. If he wanted to shoot he shot right over ARmond, if he wanted to drive he did and scored....If he wanted to back him down he did that as well as Armond was not physical enough to stop him....
Its all about the rotation that Bruce has and it has worked for the last few years and most certainly did today as Armond got tired late in the game and Joah was fresh and continued to dominaten as he had all game long
|
|
|
|
Post by spike1057 on Feb 5, 2005 18:06:13 GMT -6
Woooo wait a second there UWMB. Armond also had his way with a Tucker if im not mistaken he had 6 O boards where was this powerful Tucker when he was owning him on the glass. Not to mention Armond scored more then his average which would prove he was not having problems backing in to take shots.
|
|
|
|
Post by Horizonleaguer on Feb 5, 2005 18:32:49 GMT -6
Joah also scored double his average tonight....Joah did not match up on Armond for most of the night. James Wright was matched on ARmond for most of the day...However ARmond DID TRY to guard Joah, but to no avail..
Nice try though, I busted you out on that one
|
|
|
|
Post by UWMKrazie on Feb 6, 2005 15:27:52 GMT -6
Armond was also scoreless until late in the first half
|
|
|
|
Post by UICJason on Feb 6, 2005 17:24:06 GMT -6
Joah also scored double his average tonight....Joah did not match up on Armond for most of the night. James Wright was matched on ARmond for most of the day...However ARmond DID TRY to guard Joah, but to no avail.. Nice try though, I busted you out on that one You're quickly getting on my nerves. Please come here to talk about basketball, not pretend you're the master of the universe. Congrats, you won a game... |
|
|
|
Post by Horizonleaguer on Feb 6, 2005 22:33:13 GMT -6
Hey Jason,
I know you cant take the truth..Chill out, We won, you guys lost, Joah is better than Armond, Ed is better than Ced....End of story ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by UICJason on Feb 6, 2005 23:04:57 GMT -6
Again, you're not talking about basketball. What in the world makes you think Ed is better than Ced. UWM is better than UIC? Yes. You played a much better game. Ced was the leading scorer in the game and quite dominant. Does he have the supporting cast? No.
Don't just make blanket statements and expect to not be called out for it. You're on a UIC MB. If you want to discuss things intelligently, please go for it. If you want to act like a fool and "ha ha ha" and make stupid smiley faces, then we have no need for it.
|
|
|
|
Post by spike1057 on Feb 6, 2005 23:36:50 GMT -6
HL you are the biggest homer I have ever seen. Dont make stupid remarks like this. Everyone in the whole confrence knows that Banks is the best player in the league, hes proven it for 4 yrs.
Next you'll be telling us how your pizza is better then chicagos' please get off of the koolaid your own causes its a joke. And once again Tucker really is not better the williams if anything they are around the same level. Did tucker score more then williams yes, but williams made him look like a fool on all defensive stats.
|
|
